no_country_for_old_men_coen.jpg

I’m not writing this to generate controversy, I’m just honestly perplexed. Perhaps this year hasn’t been that great in terms of cinematic quality? Maybe it’s just me?

I recently eagerly awaited the chance to finally catch NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN. I am still recovering from a debilitating illness, and getting out does take a little more effort than the average bear. I was happy to be able to catch the film that has gotten raves from the DGA, and the SGA, amongst other Hollywood elite. It’s shortlisted to sweep the Oscars.
I have to interject that I am a fan of the Coens: FARGO, and especially THE BIG LEBOWSKI are amongst my fave films.

Still, I have to admit I was extremely disappointed in their latest offering. The film can be honestly described in a few sentences: a man finds money from a drug dealer’s shootout. Said man tries to keep money while evading a ruthless hitman hired to get the money back. Is there more to it? Maybe I missed it. Tommy Lee Jones’ speech at the end of the film was supposed to be profound, yet I found it belonging in a different movie. Javier Bardem’s hitman was a bit of a hoot, but so much was left unexplained. I don’t need every detail revealed (HANNIBAL RISING, anyone?), but it seemed that he just played a one-note character adequately. It’s like giving an award to Jason Voorhees.

Am I wrong? Have I lost it? Let me know!!

5 Comments

  1. Chris - Posted on 13/02/08 @ 12:15pm

    Well, I thought the ending fit the picture, but I think people are trying to read more into it than there is.

    // Spoilers from here on out.

    At the start of the film Tommy Lee Jones’s character makes mention of all the ugliness in the world, the degree to which it seems to have increased, and how it has led him to believe he’s now too old for the job.

    The film is filled with moments of shocking violence, and by the end every “good person” is dead — even Kelly MacDonald. Only the killer and Jones himself is left alive.

    But then there’s the exchange with his brother, and he makes mention of a terrible incident that occurred before Jones was even born..how the world’s always been cruel, and there’s no changing it.

    The end, especially with the dream sequence explanation is simply stating that ugliness will continue, until peace is ultimately found in death. That’s really all there is to it.

    What I see as problematic though, is the complete drop in tension that occurs in the final act. While interesting on a philosophical level, it really stood at odds with all the modern-western mayhem that filled the first half of the movie, making the film drag unnecessarily.

    But, yah , like you, I don’t think this was one of the best films of the year at all. Heck, it’s not even one of the Coen Bros’ best films. A good film on all accounts, but I think even O Brother Where Art Thou was far superior. Maybe it’s just a case of the academy making up for previous oversight.

  2. Chris - Posted on 13/02/08 @ 12:16pm

    Oh yah, and Tower, nice to see you writing again. Glad to hear of your recovery, and hope things keep looking upward for you :)

  3. Gazz - Posted on 16/02/08 @ 6:37am

    WELCOME BACK GUYS!

    Jeez, been a long time! Loving the new site too! Got to say though, as someone who voted this flick as his number one of 2007, I’ve got to disagree with you here. Then again, opinions are like arse-holes. Everyone has got one and invariably they all stink a little at some point. I thought this was flawless filmmaking!

    Keep up the EXCELLENT work!

  4. Al - Posted on 20/02/08 @ 8:45pm

    You know, I, too, wasn’t all that enamored with “No Country.” And I’m not saying it wasn’t good or anything. I enjoyed it immensely, especially after the last couple of Coen Bros. films. I agree with the idea that the premise was a bit simplistic for the Bros’ Coen, and that Bardem’s performance (though badass) wasn’t this supposed revelation. I didn’t read the novel but I’m familiar with Cormac McCarthy. I still can’t help but think the film would’ve been more special and enduring if it was an actual Western.

  5. deepu - Posted on 28/02/08 @ 9:54am

    pessimistic view of the outside world

Leave a Comment

Note: We use Gravatars on Film Rotation, they are the icons that appear next to your name on this site (and on many others). You can get a Gravatar account for free and any other site that supports it will show your avatar too!

Navigation

Post Meta

You are reading What’s So Special About No Country For Old Men? on Film Rotation. This article was written by Tower on 12th February 2008 in the Film categories. If you have any comments about this article, you can contact Tower by email, or leave a comment below. You can also follow comments made on this article via our RSS 2.0 feed.

If you would like to continue reading more, the previous article on our site is called George A. Romero’s Diary Of The Dead Trailer!! and the next article is called WGA: Thank You FilmRot!.