<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s So Special About No Country For Old Men?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.filmrot.com/tower/film/so-whats-so-special-about-no-country-for-old-men/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.filmrot.com/tower/film/so-whats-so-special-about-no-country-for-old-men</link>
	<description>Matt Damon's Gonna Be Pissed</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: deepu</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmrot.com/tower/film/so-whats-so-special-about-no-country-for-old-men#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>deepu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmrot.com/tower/film/so-whats-so-special-about-no-country-for-old-men#comment-91</guid>
		<description>pessimistic view of the outside world</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pessimistic view of the outside world</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmrot.com/tower/film/so-whats-so-special-about-no-country-for-old-men#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 04:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmrot.com/tower/film/so-whats-so-special-about-no-country-for-old-men#comment-57</guid>
		<description>You know, I, too, wasn't all that enamored with "No Country." And I'm not saying it wasn't good or anything. I enjoyed it immensely, especially after the last couple of Coen Bros. films. I agree with the idea that the premise was a bit simplistic for the Bros' Coen, and that Bardem's performance (though badass) wasn't this supposed revelation. I didn't read the novel but I'm familiar with Cormac McCarthy. I still can't help but think the film would've been more special and enduring if it was an actual Western.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I, too, wasn&#8217;t all that enamored with &#8220;No Country.&#8221; And I&#8217;m not saying it wasn&#8217;t good or anything. I enjoyed it immensely, especially after the last couple of Coen Bros. films. I agree with the idea that the premise was a bit simplistic for the Bros&#8217; Coen, and that Bardem&#8217;s performance (though badass) wasn&#8217;t this supposed revelation. I didn&#8217;t read the novel but I&#8217;m familiar with Cormac McCarthy. I still can&#8217;t help but think the film would&#8217;ve been more special and enduring if it was an actual Western.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gazz</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmrot.com/tower/film/so-whats-so-special-about-no-country-for-old-men#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Gazz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 14:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmrot.com/tower/film/so-whats-so-special-about-no-country-for-old-men#comment-24</guid>
		<description>WELCOME BACK GUYS!

Jeez, been a long time! Loving the new site too! Got to say though, as someone who voted this flick as his number one of 2007, I've got to disagree with you here. Then again, opinions are like arse-holes. Everyone has got one and invariably they all stink a little at some point. I thought this was flawless filmmaking! 

Keep up the EXCELLENT work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WELCOME BACK GUYS!</p>
<p>Jeez, been a long time! Loving the new site too! Got to say though, as someone who voted this flick as his number one of 2007, I&#8217;ve got to disagree with you here. Then again, opinions are like arse-holes. Everyone has got one and invariably they all stink a little at some point. I thought this was flawless filmmaking! </p>
<p>Keep up the EXCELLENT work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmrot.com/tower/film/so-whats-so-special-about-no-country-for-old-men#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmrot.com/tower/film/so-whats-so-special-about-no-country-for-old-men#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Oh yah, and Tower, nice to see you writing again. Glad to hear of your recovery, and hope things keep looking upward for you :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yah, and Tower, nice to see you writing again. Glad to hear of your recovery, and hope things keep looking upward for you <img src='http://blog.filmrot.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://blog.filmrot.com/tower/film/so-whats-so-special-about-no-country-for-old-men#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.filmrot.com/tower/film/so-whats-so-special-about-no-country-for-old-men#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Well, I thought the ending fit the picture, but I think people are trying to read more into it than there is.

// Spoilers from here on out.

At the start of the film Tommy Lee Jones's character makes mention of all the ugliness in the world, the degree to which it seems to have increased, and how it has led him to believe he's now too old for the job. 

The film is filled with moments of shocking violence, and by the end every "good person" is dead -- even Kelly MacDonald. Only the killer and Jones himself is left alive. 

But then there's the exchange with his brother, and he makes mention of a terrible incident that occurred before Jones was even born..how the world's always been cruel, and there's no changing it.

The end, especially with the dream sequence explanation is simply stating that ugliness will continue, until peace is ultimately found in death. That's really all there is to it.

What I see as problematic though, is the complete drop in tension that occurs in the final act. While interesting on a philosophical level, it really stood at odds with all the modern-western mayhem that filled the first half of the movie, making the film drag unnecessarily.

But, yah , like you, I don't think this was one of the best films of the year at all. Heck, it's not even one of the Coen Bros' best films. A good film on all accounts, but I think even O Brother Where Art Thou was far superior. Maybe it's just a case of the academy making up for previous oversight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I thought the ending fit the picture, but I think people are trying to read more into it than there is.</p>
<p>// Spoilers from here on out.</p>
<p>At the start of the film Tommy Lee Jones&#8217;s character makes mention of all the ugliness in the world, the degree to which it seems to have increased, and how it has led him to believe he&#8217;s now too old for the job. </p>
<p>The film is filled with moments of shocking violence, and by the end every &#8220;good person&#8221; is dead &#8212; even Kelly MacDonald. Only the killer and Jones himself is left alive. </p>
<p>But then there&#8217;s the exchange with his brother, and he makes mention of a terrible incident that occurred before Jones was even born..how the world&#8217;s always been cruel, and there&#8217;s no changing it.</p>
<p>The end, especially with the dream sequence explanation is simply stating that ugliness will continue, until peace is ultimately found in death. That&#8217;s really all there is to it.</p>
<p>What I see as problematic though, is the complete drop in tension that occurs in the final act. While interesting on a philosophical level, it really stood at odds with all the modern-western mayhem that filled the first half of the movie, making the film drag unnecessarily.</p>
<p>But, yah , like you, I don&#8217;t think this was one of the best films of the year at all. Heck, it&#8217;s not even one of the Coen Bros&#8217; best films. A good film on all accounts, but I think even O Brother Where Art Thou was far superior. Maybe it&#8217;s just a case of the academy making up for previous oversight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
